Is it time to change your Google password

I suggested to a long time client that they change their google password and was surprised when i saw the date of the last password change..

If you haven’t changed your Google password since the last major data breach, now’s the time to do it. Even if your account wasn’t directly affected, breaches often expose login credentials that hackers later sell or reuse across other services. Since many people reuse passwords (even slightly modified ones), a compromised database from any site could put your Google account at risk. Changing your password helps reset that exposure and ensures that anyone who may have obtained your old credentials can’t get in.

Beyond your emails, your Google account is the key to a lot more—Drive files, Photos, Maps history, and even linked third-party apps. A single unauthorized login could expose personal or professional information, and attackers can move fast once they’re in. Updating your password acts like changing the locks on your digital home after hearing someone’s been picking doors in the neighborhood. It’s a small action that greatly reduces your vulnerability.

When you change your password, it’s also a good moment to strengthen your security overall. Choose a strong, unique password (or use a password manager), and make sure two-factor authentication is turned on. This way, even if your credentials ever leak again, that extra verification step will protect you. Staying proactive with password hygiene isn’t paranoia—it’s digital self-defense in an age where breaches are more common than ever.

  what do you think.  ;)

---

NETGEAR 8-Port Gigabit Ethernet PoE+ Smart Managed Plus Switch (GS308EP)

-20% $103.99

Cracking the MTU Mystery: How Wireshark Uncovers Hidden Network Bottlenecks

When troubleshooting network performance issues, especially when tools like iperf3 show inconsistent throughput between two devices, one of the most overlooked culprits is an MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) mismatch or mismatch with an intermediate network device. MTU defines the largest size of a packet that can be transmitted without fragmentation. If two devices are operating with incompatible MTU settings, packets may be fragmented, dropped, or delayed—leading to unpredictable performance results. This is where Wireshark, a powerful packet capture and analysis tool, becomes indispensable.

Wireshark allows you to see exactly what’s happening at the packet level. By capturing and analyzing traffic during an iperf3 test, you can identify telltale signs of MTU problems—such as fragmented packets, “Fragmented IP Protocol” warnings, or ICMP “Fragmentation Needed” messages. These insights go far beyond what iperf3 alone can reveal, turning Wireshark into a digital microscope for your network. Instead of guessing where the problem lies, you can pinpoint the exact source of inefficiency.

Another key advantage of using Wireshark in MTU troubleshooting is its ability to visualize the packet flow and timing in real time. Engineers can track how packets traverse the network path, detect retransmissions, and confirm whether packets are being dropped due to size constraints. With its advanced filtering capabilities, Wireshark lets you isolate just the traffic between your two iperf3 endpoints, simplifying analysis and helping you focus on what matters most.

Ultimately, using Wireshark to investigate MTU issues transforms guesswork into data-driven problem solving. Instead of applying random fixes—like adjusting MTU values on routers or host NICs—you can make precise, evidence-based changes. The combination of iperf3 for performance testing and Wireshark for deep packet inspection provides a complete view of the network’s behavior. Together, they empower you to eliminate performance bottlenecks, ensure optimal throughput, and maintain a smooth, efficient connection between your devices.

See, sometimes “The Network” can be the problem.

---

WAVLINK USB 3.0 to SATA I/II/III Dual-Bay External Hard Drive Docking Station for 2.5/3.5 Inch HDD/SSD

Android FREEBIE - Sound Meter - Decibel Meter

Hey android users,

I just saw that this was free and thought i would share

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=app.tools.soundmeter.decibel.noisedetector.pro

im going to check it out

From the Net: Have You Heard About Windows Performance Analyzer

When something feels off with our PCs, most of us go straight for the usual suspects. You open Task Manager, glance at the CPU and memory graphs, maybe fire up HWiNFO or MSI Afterburner, and start guessing from there. But what if the culprit isn’t obvious?

There’s a far more powerful tool built right into Windows’ ecosystem that most people have never heard of: Windows Performance Analyzer (WPA). It’s one of Microsoft’s most underrated utilities, and is incredibly deep. If you want to better understand what might be ailing your PC, this is the tool to do just that.

click on the image to read the article or the image for the document below

---

Keysight: How to Overcome the Darkside of Moving Apps to the Cloud

First up, the paper kicks off by acknowledging the big promise of public cloud platforms: faster time-to-market, flexibility, scalable business apps, and so on. But it quickly pulls back the curtain and warns that many organizations hit a “dark side” — unexpected performance issues, runaway costs, downtime, and diminished ROI. In fact, the data shows a hefty chunk of companies are already pulling workloads back on-premises because the cloud move didn’t go as expected.

Then, it digs into the root of the issues. A big culprit: organizations leap into the cloud without a clear strategy for which apps should move and why. That can lead to costly cycles of move → undo → re-move. It also lists core problem areas: security concerns, performance degradation, vendor lock-in, multi-cloud complexity, and hidden costs. The paper emphasizes that the cloud isn’t automatically better just because “cloud” sounds good — you still need to plan thoughtfully.

The next part of the paper deals with getting visibility and monitoring in place. If you move apps to the cloud (or mix cloud + on-premises), you must still see what’s going on: traffic, latency, application performance, security anomalies. Without that visibility you’re flying blind and can’t detect problems or validate that your cloud provider is delivering. It talks about building a three-layer visibility architecture (data access, control plane, monitoring layer) plus active monitoring tools and synthetic tests to stress applications and ensure SLAs really hold up.

Finally, the paper offers a pragmatic conclusion: there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. If cloud doesn’t make sense for some workloads, moving them back on-premises or using a hybrid model might be the best move. The goal is to pick the right tool for the right job, not just chase hype. It emphasizes that visibility isn’t optional — you must have a scalable architecture for it — and that a hybrid approach may give you the flexibility to harness cloud benefits when they work, and keep control when they don’t.

Click on the image to get the pdf